Great question! Understanding the difference between a UDF (User Defined Function) and built-in Spark SQL functions is crucial for writing performant PySpark code.
๐ UDF vs In-built Spark Function
Feature | UDF (User Defined Function) | In-built Spark Function |
---|---|---|
Definition | A custom function defined by the user to extend Spark’s capabilities | Predefined, optimized functions provided by Spark (e.g., col , lit , lower ) |
Performance | โ Slower โ breaks Catalyst optimization | โ Faster โ fully optimized by Catalyst |
Serialization Overhead | High โ uses Python/Java serialization | Low โ avoids serialization, uses internal JVM objects |
Null Handling | Manual โ you need to check for nulls explicitly | Handled internally and efficiently |
Language Compatibility | Works across Python, Scala, Java, R | Works across all Spark APIs |
Ease of Use | Flexible but verbose | Easy to use and concise |
Vectorization | โ Not supported | โ Supported (e.g., for columnar formats) |
Use Case | Complex logic not available in built-ins | Common operations (math, string, date, array, JSON, etc.) |
๐ง Example
๐น Using a Spark In-built Function (Fast & Optimized)
from pyspark.sql.functions import upper
df.select(upper(df.name)).show()
๐น Using a UDF (Slower & Non-Optimized)
from pyspark.sql.functions import udf
from pyspark.sql.types import StringType
def custom_upper(name):
return name.upper() if name else None
upper_udf = udf(custom_upper, StringType())
df.select(upper_udf(df.name)).show()
๐ง Key Takeaway
โ Always prefer built-in Spark SQL functions over UDFs for better performance and optimization.
โ Use UDFs only when the logic cannot be expressed with Spark functions.
No โ UDFs (User Defined Functions) do not run on the driver side.
They run on the executor nodes โ just like regular Spark transformations.
๐ Detailed Explanation
โ Where UDFs Run
- When you define a UDF in PySpark (or Scala), it is serialized and shipped to each executor.
- Then, during DataFrame transformations, each executor runs the UDF on the partitions of data it owns.
๐ So UDFs do NOT run on the driver, but rather on the worker (executor) nodes, just like built-in Spark operations.
โ ๏ธ Why Confusion Happens
Some users think UDFs run on the driver because:
- UDFs involve Python code, and PySpark has to serialize data between JVM (Spark) and Python (via Py4J).
- This creates overhead and slower execution compared to Spark’s in-built JVM-optimized functions.
โ ๏ธ But still โ the execution happens on the executors, not on the driver.
๐งช Confirm with Example
from pyspark.sql.functions import udf
from pyspark.sql.types import StringType
import socket
def where_am_i(val):
return socket.gethostname() # Returns executor hostname
hostname_udf = udf(where_am_i, StringType())
df.withColumn("executor_host", hostname_udf(df["name"])).show()
๐ This will show the executor hostnames, proving that the UDF runs on executors, not the driver.
๐ง Summary
Statement | True/False |
---|---|
UDFs run only on driver | โ False |
UDFs run on executors (like other transformations) | โ True |
UDFs are slower than in-built functions | โ True |
UDFs cause serialization overhead in PySpark | โ True |
Leave a Reply