Excellent question — you’re right that Spark is written in Scala, but what the Tungsten engine does goes deeper into how Spark executes code at runtime — beyond Scala, into compiled machine-level execution.
Let’s break it down clearly:
✅ Spark Language vs Execution Layers
| Layer | Description |
|---|---|
| User Code | You write in PySpark, Scala, or Java |
| Spark Core | Spark is implemented in Scala (runs on the JVM) |
| Catalyst Optimizer | Builds optimized logical and physical execution plans |
| Tungsten Engine | Converts physical plans into low-level, byte-efficient execution |
🔧 What is Machine Code in Context of Tungsten?
When we say “optimized machine code” in Spark Tungsten, it doesn’t mean raw assembly — it refers to:
🔹 Bytecode-level or CPU-efficient execution via:
- Java bytecode (runs on JVM)
- Off-heap memory use (manual memory mgmt like in C++)
- Whole-stage code generation (WSCG): Spark generates custom Java code at runtime for entire query stages → compiled into JVM bytecode → just-in-time (JIT) compiled into machine code by the JVM.
So yes, Spark itself is written in Scala, but at execution time, Spark uses the Tungsten engine to generate Java code, which the JVM converts to native machine code via the JIT compiler.
🔥 What Tungsten Actually Optimizes
| Area | Optimized Behavior |
|---|---|
| Memory management | Uses off-heap memory + manual control (like C++) for lower GC overhead |
| Cache locality | Organizes data in cache-friendly binary format (UnsafeRow) |
| Code generation | Avoids Java object creation by generating Java code at runtime (WSCG) |
| Execution speed | Enables the JVM’s JIT to compile the whole transformation chain into fast code |
📌 Real Example
Consider this:
df = spark.read.parquet("data/")
df = df.filter("age > 30").groupBy("country").count()
df.show()
Under Tungsten:
- The query plan is optimized (Catalyst)
- Spark generates Java source code for this entire chain
- It compiles the Java to bytecode
- JVM uses JIT compiler to turn this into native machine code on your CPU
So Spark avoids object overhead and interpreters during runtime — instead, it executes like a compiled language.
💡 Summary
| Myth | Reality |
|---|---|
| “Spark is Scala so runs slow” | Spark uses Scala for logic, but Tungsten makes execution CPU-efficient |
| “Machine code = Assembly” | Not directly. Spark → Java bytecode → JIT → CPU machine code |
| “Spark is interpreted” | Not anymore — Tungsten enables compiled-style performance |
Leave a Reply